National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Thursday, August 29, 2019

Question:

I have just bought an old house (ca 1965) to serve as my primary domicile. I bought it with the knowledge that the existing electrical installation isn't up to snuff. The specific issues I'd like to address are that there are no grounded outlets anywhere in the house, many fewer outlets and lights than needed, no GFI circuits, an aluminum input wire to the 100 amp breaker box (the rest of the house is 12 gauge, or better, copper) and no ground stake. The major work will be done by professionals but putting in the missing ground wires, locating and installing the extra outlets and switches along with the attendant new wiring is something I can do. And now, finally, the question I need to have answered is, "When upgrading the existing, ungrounded outlets, will single, naked copper ground wire, ran alongside the existing copper supply and correctly connected to each new, three prong outlet meet code?

William Key
A

Answer:

Hey William thanks for your question. Yes, what you are suggesting can be done if it meets the rules in 250.130(C) and 406.4(D). A "separate" equipment grounding conductor can be run from the new grounding type receptacles (replacing the existing non-grounding type receptacles) but it must be connected to any of the items in 250.130(C). Most of those items are probably near or within the paneboard (breaker box) that supplies the outlets. The separate equipment grounding conductors must be protected from physical damage by being in an identified raceway or cable armor if smaller that 6 AWG.

If you can run a separate equipment grounding conductor to that location why not have new cables installed from the panelboard resulting in a better installation? You don't mention what the "major work" includes but possibly you can help the qualified electrician by doing some of the work under their supervision without it costing much more.

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.