National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Monday, November 12, 2018

Question:

Re: CQD answer published Monday, October 29, 2018 - Grounded conductor disconnect for fuel dispenser

1) Good morning, I'm not on CMP14 but you should look at FR7743 for the 2020 NEC. It answers the question. Thanks. J Grant Hammett

2) I do not serve on CMP-14, but I do recall that 514.11(A) was revised to align with the requirements in NFPA 30A (Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages) and to clarify what is required for an emergency shutoff device at both an attend and an unattended self-service motor fuel dispensing facilities. Seems like I also recall CMP-14 discussing the fact that the requirement “to remove all external voltage sources, including power, communications, data, and video circuits” was (and is) already located at 514.13 (Provisions for Maintenance and Service of Dispensing Equipment) and that the requirement for switching the grounded conductor did not need to be repeated at 514.11(A). Some would argue that the emergency disconnect is not the same as the maintenance disconnect. Regards, L. Keith Lofland

3) The bigger question is, why was the requirement there in the first place? Dave

A

Answer:

Hey all y'all thanks for your comments and follow-up question. The rule for also disconnecting the grounded conductor was restored by CMP14 by First Revision 7743 in the first draft. A sentence was added to not disconnect equipment grounding conductors. The following panel statement was provided: "The grounded conductor should be disconnected simultaneously with the all of the other conductors when the emergency disconnect is activated. It should also be clear that the equipment grounding conductors should not be disconnected. Added 2014 NEC wording at the end of 514.11(A) instead of the proposed new subsection (D)."

The "why" is not included in the panel statement and the original rule has been there since at least 1959 but the original proposal with a why does not seem to exist in the archives. A grounded conductor can carry current under normal conditions and it is possible the reason is to help ensure an arc will not occur because of the additional concern of the flammable fuel.

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.