National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Question:

How do you keep your integrity as a qualified electrician who tries to follow the NEC to the best of your ability? For example, you are on a job where the 2nd breaker panel in a structure (120/240) has only 3 conductors supplying it from the main breaker panel. You know per the NEC that the main breaker panel is the only place where the neutral bar and grounding equipment bar can be connected. But you see in the 2nd panel there is no grounding equipment conductor, there is no separate grounding equipment bar, and the neutral bar in the panel is connected to the case. What do you do when you are asked to add a new 120-volt circuit and you know the owner is not going to spend the money to have you correct the wiring between main panel and 2nd panel? It’s even worse when on a farmstead when all outbuildings have 3 conductors supplying them from the service equipment at the meter pole. When you tell the owner that it is not wired correctly, the owner looks at you like you’re half-crazy and you know he is thinking “it has worked OK the way it is wired for the past 30, 40, or 50 years. I’ll just get another electrician to add the circuit.” Does one go ahead and add the circuit? Is there anything in the current NEC that allows one to wire the “old way” that once was acceptable by the NEC?

Rick Polley
A

Answer:

Hey Rick thanks for your question. The simple answer is do the right thing. Just because something seems to be working without evidence of a problem doesn't mean that an incident will not happen. If it is obvious that an existing installation is non-compliant, adding to it could very easily be considered negligence or a willful violation. It is often stated that if you refuse to do the work, they will find someone that will. That might be true but then they have the liability for what can happen. The NEC isn't considered retroactive by the words in Annex H, 80.9 but new installations need to comply.

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.