National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Wednesday, March 15, 2023

Question:

Hello Charlie, I am interested in the reasoning behind NEC 240.101(A) allowing the long-time trip element setting of a breaker (over 1000V) to be set as high as six times the ampacity of the conductor. I’m sure 6X was specifically chosen for some reason. Is it related to inrush or some other factor?Thanks, Jason D. Light
A

Answer:

Hi Jason, thank you for your question. When selecting overcurrent protection for any system and especially for over 1000V systems there are three (3) primary objectives:

Safety – Does the OCPD offer sufficient protection rated to carry and interrupt available fault currents and load over-currents? This helps in avoiding catastrophe in worst case scenarios.

Equipment Protection – This goes hand in hand with Safety OCPD must be sized to protect the equipment from damage.

Selectivity – Reliability is always important and, in some cases, mandatory for certain systems. OCPD plays a major role in reliability.  

Remember the requirements in the NEC® are the minimum, meaning one can always go above and beyond. For over 1000V systems, Section 240.101(A) of the 2020 NEC® permits the continuous ampere rating of a fuse to be sized not more than three (3) times the conductor ampacity.  

The long-time trip element setting of a breaker can be set not more than six (6) times the ampacity of the conductor. These maximums provide enough latitude for OCPD to be set to handle high inrush currents and operational loads but set below equipment damage thresholds. This helps to achieve the needed level of safety, protection of equipment and maintain reliability.

 It is also important to mention that in the 2023 Edition of the NEC® the OCPD requirements for over a 1000V are now located in a separate Article, Article 245. More comprehensive requirements for Circuit-Interrupting Devices for these systems are now found in Section 245.21(A)-(E).

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.