National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Question:

The transformer in the switchgear  has an output at 480 volts of 1203 amperes.

The main breaker in the gear downstream of the transformer is a 1600 Amp. With the 80% rating inherent in breakers, this 1600 amp breaker will carry 1280 amperes for continuous loads. Code defines continuous as 3 hours or more, which would apply to the machine operation we are installing. Thus the 1600 amp breaker will have a max rating of 1280 amperes. We are installing a 1000 kva transformer that max load is 1204.

By code do I have to run feeders large enough for the 1600 amp breaker or can I run feeders for the 1204 amp draw. Piping directly into my transformer. With no disconnecting means at transformer. Which is 110' away in another room. Thanks for all the great stuff I learned from you. Brett

A

Answer:

Hey Brett thanks for your question and you are welcome. Feeder conductors must be suitable for the load as stated in 215.2 and if the load is entirely continuous, they must be sized at 125% of the load. The 1600 ampere overcurrent device in your example still has a rating of 1600 it must also be sized at 125% for continuous loads as stated in 215.3.

You don't say what the continuous load is but that is where we need to start. Let's use 1200 amperes as an example. The conductors would need to have an ampacity of at least 1500 amperes (1200 X 1.25%). The overcurrent device must also have a minimum rating of 1500 (same math) based on 215.2 and 215.3.

The 110 ft secondary conductors are another problem because overcurrent devices need to be provided where conductors receive their supply as stated in 240.21 unless we can find another rule that allows something different. The rules in 240.21(C) that are applicable to your situation generally limit the length to be 25 feet along with other conditions. Also, don't forget about transformer protection as stated in 450.3.

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.