National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Thursday, December 22, 2022

Question:

Hi CQD! Regarding the CQD on November 23. It was interesting to read that the 6" (min.) conductor required in a box can now be spliced or un-spliced. I agree with your interpretation of the change in 2023. Does this now mean that I could rough in a residence with NM cable and leave only a 1/2" of wire stubbed into the box with the intent to come back later and add a butt splice to get the required 6"?

I know this example is extreme, but with this change what is to stop someone from pushing the limits like the example given?

 Regards, Eddie Guidry

A

Answer:

Eddie, thank you for your comments regarding the Code change in Section 300.14. It is clear you are very passionate about safety. During the 2023 revision process, there was support for the change as it clarified how Section 300.14 was already being interpreted by most AHJs. Section 300.14 never required the 6 inches of free conductor length to be free of splices, and the CMP recognized that there are times where splicing may be appropriate.

Additionally, there are other Code Sections that would allow an AHJ to prohibit installations that tried to abuse the clarified language. Here are some of the other Code Sections that AHJs use to prevent scenarios where the splices may cause a safety concern:

  •  Section 110.3 (A)-(C) Examination, Use and Listing of Equipment – This would ensure the proper equipment and listed products are going to be used to make a proper splice.
  • Section 110.7 Wiring Integrity – Requires wiring installations are free from short circuits, ground faults, or any connections to ground other than as required or permitted elsewhere in this Code.
  • Section 110.12(B) Mechanical Execution of Work - Requires equipment to be installed in a professional and skillful manner.
  • Section 110.12(B) Integrity of Electrical Equipment.
  • Section 110.14 Electrical Connections.
  • Section 110.14(B) Splices

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.